Topic: Life
Warning: The content and subject matter is of a sexual nature. Adult discretion is advised.
About a week or so ago, I posted a video by 'Jesusophile' entitled "Why Atheist Arguments Don't Work" and my response to it. For those unfamiliar with this individual, below is a link to his YouTube video channel, in case you need a frame of reference.
https://www.youtube.com/user/jesusophile
There has been a sort of video blog war between Atheists and Christians for sometime now on YouTube, arguing creation vs. evolution, the bible vs. human behavior and the list literally goes on and on. I often have the misfortune of tripping across these videos, as I frequently search the YouTube category 'Nonprofits & Activism' for the latest information regarding animal rights, the environment, and related issues. Since there is no 'Religion & Spirituality' category on YouTube, individuals espousing either religious or anti-religious opinions regularly post in the afore mentioned category. This is how I discovered my first video blog of 'Jesusophile'.
I have spent some time, probably too much time to be honest, trying to discern if this young man sincerely believes in the opinions he publicizes, if his opinions are merely satire of the social absurdity, or if he is a "troll" (someone who knowingly creates controversy to generate activity on his website/channel -or- to derive entertainment from comments (video or other) from viewers who object to same said controversy).
There are valid reasons for my confusion. One example of this is that his videos are not listed in the 'Comedy' category on YouTube, but rather a section associated with activism. If the subject matter of his videos are intended as a form of comedy or satire, then why wouldn't the videos be posted to an area reserved for humor?
Another example, is the fact that he provides no disclaimer that the material in his videos are intended as satire either in the video itself, the description, or the tags. This type of warning is common for most satirists so that their material is not misinterpreted or misconstrued as actual opinion.
If you take the previous examples into account you are left with the choices that he either truly believes his opinions, or he is a troll.
Given that the videos he lists as his favorites are mostly those that have expressed passionate disagreement with his opinions, it is far easier to conclude that Jesusophile is nothing more than a troll. This may seem harmless on the surface, but can potentially reap hazardous results.
When you consider the struggle that the gay community as a whole has in being accepted as equal members of our often intolerant society, the self identity struggles of women and the roles expected of them, and the silent confusion and shame that puberty suffers upon teens discovering their bodies for the first time, the unconscionable ideas that Jesusophile espouses publicly are hurtful and demeaning to what ought to be a civilized, socially and intellectually evolved society, in my opinion.
Whether satire or fast held personal belief, it is irresponsible to broadcast to an audience of teen - adult, possibly younger, that, "Anal sex is wrong ... pain is a sign from God in saying, Hey, gay people, stop doing that.", "Sex is not something that is supposed to be pleasurable for the female, it is primarily something the man will enjoy ... the woman was created for the man's pleasure.", or "Men shouldn't do that sort of thing [masturbate] ... because that's wasted sperm ... that's potential civilizations flushed down the toilet." (These are quotes directly from one of his videos posted on YouTube entitled "Why it is okay for sex to hurt...").
These uneducated and intolerant statements, which are devoid of any trace of humor aside from perhaps inane stupidity, are dangerous in their potential to motivate prejudice within impressionable minds. It sends a message, in my opinion, that hate mongering and bigotry is funny or an acceptable behavior to endeavor in, and exploits the fear motivated contempt that already exists within the narrow-minded who share similar, if not identical, beliefs.
I don't deny Jesusophile the right to say whatever he wishes, no matter what the motivation... or the lack thereof. However, I strongly disagree with the content of his videos, satire or no. They are insensitive, divisive, injurious, and reckless.
My opinion is my own self proclamation of free speech.
By the way? WAY TO GO IOWA!!! (The Meaning of Iowa's Gay-Marriage Decision).
Brightest blessings.